Quickly learn Amazon S3 vs EBS vs EFS. S3 is eventually consistent. With a few clicks in the Amazon Management Console, you can create file systems that are accessible to Amazon EC2 instances via a file system interface (using standard operating system file I/O APIs) and support full. Amazon S3 is a cloud storage service that can be accessed from anywhere. S3 is for object storage. Now you are able to share the folders located on Amazon S3 as you would with any other Nextcloud folders. Amazon S3, FSx, Elastic File System and Elastic Block Store have different price structures, but data use remains the top factor in determining the cost of cloud storage. You don’t even have to pay for files that are less accessible, and it can automatically expand when clients need more storage, and you don’t have to pay. + IOPS costs; EFS: $0. Data downloads. With Amazon EFS, you can create a file system, mount the file system on an Amazon EC2 instance, and then read and write data to and from your file system. EFS is $0. Elastic Block Storage (EBS). EBS has a lower price per GB-month compared to EFS—$0. The Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) provides a simple, scalable, elastic file system for Linux-based workloads for use with AWS Cloud services and on-premises resources. Navigate cloud storage with our comprehensive comparison of EFS, Amazon EBS, and S3. Amazon FSx for Lustre makes it easy and cost effective to launch, run, and scale the world’s most popular high-performance file system. The EFS uses the NFS protocol and can scale up to petabytes. You can create an EFS file system and mount it to your instance when you launch your instance using the Amazon EFS Quick Create feature of the Amazon EC2 launch instance wizard. Simple Storage Service – S3. In this blog post, I explain the differences between these options, and discuss. Like other cloud storage options, EFS requires balancing convenience with cost. S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparision. Technology Lead, Global Database Services at Johnson & Johnson. AWS EFS vs EBS vs S3 (differences & when to use?) Asked Apr 11 '15 at 08:43. More than 700,000 data lakes run on AWS. Lower latency than S3; Highest cost of the three; Share. EFS Reduce Costs with Amazon EFS One Zone As of March 2021, Amazon reduced the costs of EFS One Zone storage classes by 47% compared to EFS Standard storage classes. 053. For e. The Difference Explained. What does each service offer? And which one is right for your business needs? What about EC2 instance store vs EBS? This article helps explain the different. Although this storage has the same availability SLA of 99. 0 and 4. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can create file systems that are accessible to Amazon EC2 instances via a file system interface (using standard operating system file I/O APIs) and support full file. EFS is a file system. To keep you on top of your data, AWS allows you to set up monitoring for your storage in seconds. EBS stands for Elastic Block Store and is a block-level storage option for use with […]It's fully atomic, eventually consistent, higher latency than GlusterFS or even NFS. EFS is highly durable storage. Getting the best performance out of Amazon EFS. For more information, see EFS Intelligent‐Tiering and EFS Lifecycle Management. 05 per GB per month. Logging and Monitoring in Amazon S3. You choose a class depending on your use case. S3 Standard for frequently. Integration with Other AWS. 04 and Azure is $0. EBS and EFS both outperform Amazon S3 in terms of IOPS and latency. Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud storage pricing varies depending on which of the three storage services you use—object storage (S3), block storage (EBS), or file storage (EFS). Elastic File System (EFS). However, as a rule of thumb, EBS will be less expensive than EFS for the same performance per GB. EBS is a high-performance per-instance block storage system designed to act as storage for a single EC2 instance (most of the time) EFS is a highly scalable file storage system designed to provide flexible storage for multiple EC2 instances. To manage the process of creating the destination file system and keeping it synced with the source file system, Amazon EFS uses a replication. The updates and changes will allow customers to leverage S3 and EFS more efficiently and cost-effectively. AWS FSx for Lustre vs EFS: Head to Head FSx for Lustre is an entirely managed service that offers high-performance, scalable, cost-effective storage for compute workloads. 017 $ per hour and an additional 0. The Takeaways. Amazon S3. Amazon Storage Services: EFS vs EBS vs S3. Lastly, the cost of AWS DataSync is quite straight forward too. ($0. One last note, these settings may be enough for many WordPress installations but in some cases, you have to optimize further. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server. 1755 per GB. AWS Systems Manager: Data transfer out to the Internet or on-premise instances costs $0. Where they differ is that instead of storing data in a minimum of three AZs, S3 One Zone-IA stores data in a single AZ and costs 20% less. The usage conditions for the Amazon S3 Intelligent-Tiering storage class are updated. Follow edited Mar 25, 2019 at 19:32. • Manually scale the size of the volumes without stopping instance. As per the title of this question, what are the practical differences between AWS EFS, EBS and S3? My understanding of each:. $0. Continuous replication of data has the advantage of being the shortest. 1 (NFSv4) protocols. Option A indicates not only Glacier but also. While the maximum size of an EBS volume can be up to 16 TB, EFS volume sizes are practically unlimited. 05 per GB-month in the US-East region. The new S3 Infrequently Accessed allows you to reduce cloud costs further without sacrificing recovery time. AWS S3 and AWS RDS are completely different storage services for specific use cases. January 29. Comparing EBS vs. EBS and EFS both outperform Amazon S3 in terms of. Of these services, the first three are the most relevant and frequently used as Glacier is meant only for the cold storage of archive data and. S3 Standard is designed for more than 99. if you were to use 1 TB of EFS Standard Storage for 15 days and 200 GB of EFS Standard Storage for the remaining 16 days of a 31 day month, your total Standard Storage would be 1,000 GB * 15 days * 24 hours/day + 200 GB * 16 days + 24 hours / day = 436800 GB-hours or. Amazon EFS replication Use EFS Replication. 005 USD per provisioned IOPS-month over 3,000. 04 = US$819. C. The Amazon EFS Standard-Infrequent Access (EFS Standard-IA) and Amazon EFS One Zone-Infrequent Access (EFS One Zone-IA) storage classes are cost-optimized for files accessed less frequently. There are multiple storage classes available in Amazon S3. Hi community, I work as a Tech Lead (Global DB SVCS) at an enterprise with 10,000+ employees. 2. Cost-effective data storage is critical when building and scaling data lakes that manage and hold growing datasets. EFS is an elastic file system that grows and shrinks based on actual usage and you pay only for what you use. EBS (or it's LAN-like equivalent EFS) is the only choice (out of the 2 being explored) if your file is going to be frequently updated (e. So when you hear or read about EBS, think “EC2 storage. The simplest way to look at is to look at what the underlying technology is. Amazon charges separately for storage by GB, and separately for the number of objects stored in S3, to compensate for the cost of processing the data to identify the optimal tier for each one. Another low-redundancy option of this storage class is Amazon S3 Reduced Redundancy Storage, or RRS. EFS is file system storage, using NFSv4 protocol. 1 Amazon web services are widely used around the world for storage options. Details are available at: Amazon S3 Simple Storage Service Pricing - Amazon Web Services S3 Standard storage (2. 023 depending on data size: Additional I/O Operations Per Second (IOPS) for extra $0. ¥ 0. 20 per MBps per month. Amazon EFS (Linux) and Amazon FSx (Windows) provide highly durable and available file systems that can span multiple Availability Zones. Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS), Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3), and Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) are all different storage systems provided by Amazon. Using us-east-1 as a reference, S3 Standard costs $0. AWS storage types across file, block and object-- including Simple Storage Service (S3), FSx, Elastic File System (EFS) and Elastic Block Store (EBS) -- vary sharply by features, management and performance. You don’t even have to pay for files that are less accessible, and it can automatically expand when clients need more storage, and you don’t have to pay. 0125 per GB-month * 200 GB). $0. Offers cost-saving storage classes ideal for infrequently access data or for data archival; provides unlimited storageThere are two types of ML inferencing architectures, single model and multi-model. These are the basic definitions. 04 * 1 GB * 30 days = $1. Working of AWS EFS; AWS EFS vs S3 vs EBS; AWS EFS pricing; Conclusion; Check out this AWS full course video by Intellipaat. Security: AWS S3 buckets are usable on a permission-based level that is managed through the IAM policy of the AWS account. EFS is expensive pricesely because it uses S3 to store files that aren't commonly retrieved. 0133$ per GB a month for one-zone storage. Choosing an Amazon FSx File System. 30 per GB for EFS vs. 6. Amazon FSx is billed with a combination of provisioned storage and provisioned throughput. Choose Lifecycle Management file access policy to transition files to infrequent access (1, 7, 14, 30, 60, or 90 days) using the AWS CLI, API, or Amazon EFS Management Console. EBS, EFS, FSx, and S3 are all storage solutions offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS). Alternatively, you might need to build key-value or blob/object storage system depending on the level of structure and retrieval you need. EBS is a device you can mount onto EC2. For example, a provisioned EBS volume of 500 GB with 1,000 IOPs would cost $162. For example, when using the U. In this article, I would discuss i) comparison of model training with EFS vs S3, and ii) steps to migrate from S3 to EFS and use EFS as the input data store for model training on SageMaker. 023 per GB / month, whereas EFS in the same region runs $0. 04c/1000 requests. But it’s worth considering the cost of EFS (GB/month, no bandwidth and request charges) vs S3 (bandwidth, request and GB/month) for your specific workload. AWS DataSync is an online data transfer service that can copy data between Network File System (NFS), Server Message Block (SMB) file servers, self-managed object storage, and also between AWS services. Storage Amazon EFS When to Choose Amazon EFS Amazon EFS provides simple, scalable, elastic file storage for use with compute instances on the AWS Cloud and on. 1 Answer. The key difference is that EBS is elastic (easily scalable and extensible) compared to a. Some AWS services only support using EFS (AWS Lambda, Linux ECS containers). In a physical environment this volume might be coming from storage or a server. N/A. Cuối cùng, Amazon S3 là một kho lưu trữ object rất hiệu quả trong việc lưu trữ số lượng lớn các bản sao lưu hoặc tệp người dùng. Seamlessly migrate, automate, and monitor your file transfer workflows into and out of Amazon S3 and Amazon EFS using the SFTP, FTPS, and FTP protocols. Cloud Solutions. EFS: File storage. Finally, Amazon S3 is an object store good at storing vast numbers of backups or user files. Once we add up all the costs, it starts to creep into the range of thousands of dollars per TB per month. 30 for EFS. Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud storage pricing varies depending on which of the three storage services you use—object storage (S3), block storage (EBS), or file storage (EFS). EBS vs. S3 is suitable for a write-once, read-multiple-time approach, as it can be configured for access from anywhere. Amazon S3. 0125. Amazon S3 offers a range of storage classes for the objects that you store. AWS Backup is a service that helps you centrally manage backups across multiple Amazon storage services, including EFS, DynamoDB, RDS, and AWS snapshots performed via EBS. S3 will likely provide the most durability for you, as well as being one of the cheapest solutions when only factoring in cost of storage. Amazon EFS Features. Elastic Block Storage (EBS). East Region, you can achieve a storage price of $0. S3 doesn't immediately guarantee consistency. As mentioned earlier, EC2 instances retain dataonly while they are running. 200 GB of this data resides in the EFS Standard storage class and 800 GB in the EFS Standard-IA storage class. 1629 per GB. S3 is an object store, meaning it is a higher layer data storage system, essentially it is a database "blob" storage, storing data in an underlying simple database as an object. Amazon EFS in Max I/O mode. It automatically scales as you add or remove files, so you don’t. S3, inside the network you won’t pay for network transfers, so only 1/15th the storage cost of EFS, while remaining faster and the same network access costs. Next 450 TB / month. 01 per 1,000 requests. Cost. 0025 per 1,000 objects stored. Automatically scales as you add or remove files, with no need to provision storage capacity in advance. +3 votes. EFS is a file system for many EC2 instances. Start saving on storage costs with EFS Lifecycle Management and an age-off policy (1, 7, 14, 30, 60, or 90 days). HDFS: Extremely good at scale but is only performant with double or. The full form of Amazon EBS is Amazon Elastic Block Store. Amazon S3 is perhaps the most popular of all the AWS storage types. NFSv4. This has an approximately 13x multiple over S3 — costing $0. File system access is via the NFS protocol. In other regions prices vary slightly, for example in the EU (London) region the price is $0. can automatically scale from gigabytes to petabytes of data without needing to provision storage. S3 is. $0. EBS: $0. Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is rated 8. Adding both your backup storage and backup restore charges together gives you your total monthly AWS Backup bill: Total monthly AWS Backup bill = $12 + $0. S3's standard tier costs $0. 023/GB. EFS is at best a hack that could work, but would have major issues both in scalability as well as cost. g. $0. AWS EBS: Which one should you use? Interface: S3 provides you with a web interface while EBS provides a file system interface and EFS provides a web and file system interface. The Google Cloud Platform (GCP) is one of the three major public clouds. $ 0. You can store your data in Glacier vaults and retrieve it using standard or expedited requests, depending on how fast you need your data. So, if your code needs the files locally, the EFS would be a better choice. The throughput capacity costs $2. Under Configuration, for Location type, select Amazon EFS file system. In relationship to our use case, BOS will use this method to replicate all 900 Petabytes of data into a more cost effective S3 storage class such as glacier deep archive. Cost: EFS is approximately 10 times costly than S3. In your opinion, does it make sense to use Amazon EFS for database backup from a cost perspective? 2. 0. Explore the AWS storage options: Elastic Block Storage (EBS), Elastic File System (EFS), and Simple Storage Service (S3). Amazon EBS is designed to store data in blocks (volumes of a provisioned size) attached to an Amazon EC2 instance, similar to a local disk drive on your physical machine. is EBS or EFS a reliable way to store huge media files?Additionally, EFS volumes are POSIX compatible, which means they will interoperate with legacy systems. Conclusion. Since EFS is a managed service, we don’t have to worry about maintaining and deploying the FS. 03. 10 in AWS, $0. S3 Intelligent-Tiering is the only cloud. is an object store with a simple key, value store design, and good at storing vast numbers of backups or user files. Standard retrievals allow you to access your archived data in three to five hours and cost $0. S3 Intelligent-Tiering: Automatically moves objects between two access tiers based on changing access patterns, optimizing costs. When should I use Amazon EFS vs. Think photos. It is a scalable, cloud-based file system supporting Linux-based applications and workloads that can work in tandem with AWS cloud services and on-premise resources. EBS is different from S3 in that it provides a storage volume directly connected to EC2 (Elastic Cloud Compute). Regarding cost, Amazon S3 is no doubt the cheapest in terms of pure storage costs. Data storage procurement decisions can significantly impact the overall cost and performance that comes with querying data. For e. S3 Standard Storage. Amazon Elastic File System provides a simple, serverless, set-and-forget elastic file system. A MySQL instance with the cheapest instance type costs about 0. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 5 reviews while Google Cloud Storage is ranked 4th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 38 reviews. EBS (or it's LAN-like equivalent EFS) is the only choice (out of the 2 being explored) if your file is going to be frequently updated (e. EFS vs. 742,673 professionals have used our research since 2012. 00 per provisioned MB/s-month. When an application requires a shared file system that is not I/O sensitive and requires POSIX compliance (so it can provide file permissions, for example). Key differences: EBS: Block Storage. 10240 * 2 * 0. As for pricing, it gets a bit complicated (all prices are per GB/month), but for HHD, AWS starts at $0. Cost Costs will increase in both EBS or EFS with increasing provisioned performance. EFS Systems. This will reduce the cost of your storage by up to 92 percent compared to EFS Standard and EFS One Zone storage classes respectively. You can mount an Amazon EFS file system in your virtual private cloud (VPC), through the Network. 025$ per GB a month for standard storage and 0. Can concurrently connect 1 to 1000s of EC2 instances, from. . Connect To EFS from your EC2 servers. 0125 per GB-month for the EBS Snapshots Archive storage, you are charged $2. AWS EFS vs other NFS storage Hey guys, I hope you guys are all well and safe from covid. Don't know why you thought using S3 directly would be cheaper. Data in EFS is accessed via file paths. More precisely, Amazon S3 will automatically deliver to Amazon CloudWatch crucial metrics such as total daily storage or number of objects. I don't see how this could be write, because the pricing for EFS is always very high. Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is rated 8. 3. EFS would $60/month for 200GB to store the data, but $4. is an object store with a simple key, value store design, and good at storing vast numbers of backups or user files. Improvement: 5X. However, there are various other pricing parameters in S3, including cost per number of requests made, S3 Analytics, and data transfer out of S3 per gigabyte. Cost-wise, S3 charges based on the amount of data stored, the number of requests made, and the data transfer out of AWS while EFS charges based on the. Create Fake File. Using EFS Lifecycle Management, you can automatically move files. The Takeaways. cost: $0. · DevOps Explore the AWS storage options: Elastic Block Storage (EBS), Elastic File System (EFS), and Simple Storage Service (S3). $/Utilized GB per Month. Another important aspect is cost. This means that it is essential for individuals and businesses to determine which platform or platforms will provide the most effective data storage solutions. Cost: EFS is approximately 10 times costly than S3. EFS Intelligent-Tiering is designed to help you achieve the right price and performance blend for your application file data by. Write access performance between S3 and EFS follow a similar pattern to random file access at approx. With AWS Lake Formation, you can build secure data lakes in days instead of months. The cost of a Google Cloud implementation is determined by several factors, including services used and amount of resources needed. 4 GB/s which is 22X faster than EFS. EFS provides a file system interface, file system access semantics (such as strong consistency and file locking), and concurrently accessible storage for up to thousands of EC2 instances. To improve the throughput without paying an additional cost. 2; 40; Answer. has a cost, so one should consider when and how many calls they make to a bucket. To know whether EFS truly is the best option for you, you’ll want to compare it to your other two main options, EBS and S3. Scaling AWS EFS does not disrupt applications. 5GB, the time to fetch the video from s3 to node is very high. 04/GB, your monthly charge for data uploads and downloads over SFTP is: $0. EFS offers two performance modes – general purpose and MaxIO. EFS Standard tier storage costs $0. S3/EBS/EFS and Azure Storage. You can seamlessly migrate, automate, and monitor your file transfer workflows by maintaining existing client-side configurations for authentication, access, and firewalls — so nothing. 1 provides better performance for parallel small-file read operations (greater than 10,000 files per second) compared to NFSv4. From: EBS vs EFS vs S3 - When to Use AWS’ Three Storage Solutions: "EBS is a block storage service, which means all data within EBS is stored in equally sized blocks. FSx for Lustre has a native file system interface and functions with the Linux operating system. 3/Month; Further storage options, which may be used for temporary storing data while/before processing it:. By choosing the right storage architecture, customers are empowered to quickly experiment and migrate to AWS. Create a DataSync task with the EFS file system as the source location and the S3 bucket as the destination location: Open the AWS DataSync console. It provides a simple interface to manage file systems and supports multiple EC2 instances. Amazon EFS vs. It is used to provide the block-level storage volumes for the use of EC2 instances. The differences in monthly charges for similar amounts of S3 and EBS with provisioned I/O storage can be substantial. EBS snapshots have a flat storage cost of $0. 1 What is Amazon S3 1. 20. Amazon EFS is well suited to support a broad spectrum of use cases from highly parallelized, scale-out workloads that require the highest possible throughput to single-threaded, latency-sensitive workloads. Amazon Glacier. Ofcourse there would be read/write latency compared to EBS as EBS is designed for low-latency access to data. answered Nov 1,. EFS, and explore the differences in the storage types across management, cost, performance and uses. If you are wanting to calculate the price for a whole month, then it would be: 40GB storage = 40 * . Although this storage has the same availability SLA of 99. For example Glacier, S3, EFS allocates the storage for you based on your usage, while at. Block Storage. Amazon offers several storage services depending on your needs━Elastic Block Storage (EBS) Elastic File System (EFS), Simple Storage Service (S3), Glacier and Storage Gateway. Storage cost is based on the average storage used through the month. Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) can host static websites without a need for a web server. The Difference Explained. Sure, there’s a deeper price comparison between Amazon EFS and EBS: Amazon EFS pricing: Standard storage: $0. The other most popular file storage services provided by AWS are EBS and S3. Due to this, S3 can be used for building data lakes. is an object store with a simple key, value store design, and good at storing vast numbers of backups or user files. The latter option reduces the cost to as low as $0. Không giống như EBS hoặc EFS, S3 không bị giới hạn ở EC2. Share. 2. : EFS is NFS. Optimizing EFS costs: Amazon keeps making it. The AWS Elastic File System (EFS) is one of Amazon’s three primary storage solutions. Amazon's pricing assumes a savings of 50% and reduces the cost of HDD storage in the U. In a Region that charges $0. 0004 per 1,000 requests for S3 GET requests invoked by Lambda functions. The capacity in this can be easily adjusted and no overhead management is needed. EBS is block, EFS is file, S3 is object. These are incremental snapshots, meaning every. S3 Standard IA. It seems to be the cheapest for data storage. Adding the charges above, your total monthly bill for the AWS Transfer Family would be: $216 + $1. US East (Ohio) Within your first 12 months on AWS, you can use up to 5 GB/month on the EFS Standard storage class at no charge. $0. 045 per GB-month, less than half the price of gp2. Ultimately, choosing from EBS, S3, and EFS will depend on your company's requirements, including data usage patterns and cost constraints. Correct Answer: B. S3 – hundreds and thousands of put/get operations against S3 may start to feature on your AWS invoice. That's why it includes the 86400 calculation. 99% availability making it a very good choice for users with critical applications. It allows for simultaneous file access from multiple EC2 instances, and there are no limits on the system size. S3 Standard IA. Much like Amazon S3 and Glacier, there are different storage classes within EFS, not as many, however, they can help you save a lot of money if used correctly. 20 per month. Step 1: Create an EFS from the AWS console. Many of these have been resolved over the last couple of. Reference the S3 developer guide for technical details on Data Retrievals. 025 per GB-month. As an example of the cost optimization EFS IA provides let’s look at storage costs for 100 terabytes (100TB) of data. How it works. The first three items in the list above — ephemeral storage, elastic block storage and elastic file system. At $0. You can also pay lucid directly 20 bucks per terabyte to store in wasabi. S3 is great for static files where EBS/EFS are more intended for files that. 01 per GB for HDD storage to £0. Select from object storage, file storage, and block storage services, backup, and data migration options to build the foundation of your cloud IT environment. AWS Storage Summed Up. Using an EFS file system, you can configure instances to mount the file system. Azure Blob, you need to consider the type of business that you are running. When it was launched in February the EFS IA storage class was priced at $0. offers pay for the storage you actually use. Amazon S3: Amazon EBS: Amazon EFS: Storage Cost (US-East, for example) Amazon S3 pricing:. Sorted by: 2. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System): A fully managed, elastic, and scalable Network File System (NFS) that supports the NFSv4 protocol. The same file from S3 (same region, with Gateway Endpoint) takes 5,100ms on average. 01 per GB for data transfer in and $0. When the contents within your S3 bucket change, it'll automatically update the FSx file system to show these changes. Amazon S3 is storage for the cloud, providing you with secure, durable, highly scalable object storage. 6, while Amazon. Skip to content 1 (800) 804-9726; Info@CloudComputingTechnologies. S3. EBS: Hardly scalable. Specifically in the storage arena, AWS provides three popular services — S3, Elastic Block Store (EBS), and Elastic File System (EFS). Amazon S3 is a highly-scalable, durable, and secure object storage service that is. Amazon Glacier and Amazon S3 are primarily classified as "Data Backup" and "Cloud Storage" tools respectively. Answer – S3 is object storage and latency is higher than EBS and EFS we can host/install OS or application on it, EBS is block storage and it the default storage with Ec2 instance we can attach 1 EBS with 1 instance. It is a scalable, cloud-based file system supporting Linux-based applications and workloads that can work in tandem with AWS cloud services and on-premise resources. 025/GB-month. However, in terms of performance, EBS and EFS are superior to S3, with stronger throughput and the lowest latency. , random access files for an RDBMS) or used by an. 9. An example of Docker image using the S3 plugin is available in the GitHub repo. AWS EFS. N2WS Content Team. com; Home. EFS offers high performance up to 10 GB/sec and 500,000 IOPS. 05 per GB. EBS is block-level storage designed for Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) instances. Flexibility: AWS provides a range of file storage solutions, including AWS EFS, AWS FSx, Amazon S3 storage, and AWS EBS, which can be used to meet a wide variety of file storage use cases. Which is costlier EFS or EBS? Amazon EFS is almost 10 times more expensive than Amazon EBS pricing, but the cheaper Amazon EBS can only be accessed by one Amazon EC2 instance at a. 8. This article will talk about three common AWS storage services: Amazon Elastic Block Store (AWS EBS), Amazon Simple Storage Se. So if i use AWS EFS or EBS there wont be any necessity for the API call to S3. S3 is for object storage. Amazon EFS is a regional service that delivers single-digit millisecond latency while storing data across at least three Availability Zones and is designed for 99. Amazon EFS is a fully-managed service that makes it easy to set up, scale, and cost-optimize file storage in the Amazon Cloud.